Well.
If I
don’t write a poem
for
myself
how can
it be representative
of my “self”…
…and you are absoposilutely correct!
Any
writing starts out as something of interest— for the writer; a feeling,
emotion, a tactile sense of some sort, description of a scene or narrative
scenario…but when does it cease being that laundry, grocery or to-do list of
notes and scribbles having meaning to the writer alone, and becomes engaging to
the reader. Heck if I know.
How’s
about this? that laundry list, initially stirred only for the writers edification,
transcends the space from fridge-magnet to the emotion of the reader, when the author
stops to ponder, I’d like to have this express part of me; so, how do I make it
interesting for this particular imagined reader (or group of readers?) My
guess, it doesn’t happen, quite, that academically, but there must come a time
in the process, one gives over the self-possession of the piece and decides to
light the fuse for others to read. The trick is knowing how to refine the
writing to keep the self-identity and still make it entertaining and
enlightening for readers.
Poetry
is communication. Pure and simple.
I know of one writer who considers his works
as: dried autumn leaves on a walkway—inevitably, they will blow away, only to
be written again in a different script. Is
this the antithesis of: only for myself…? Many of his works go unsigned;
most go unrecorded beyond the initial generation for submission, and usually
then, without copies. So many times, he is amused to find his works in some
magazine or book, occasionally a publication he’s never even addressed. If a
fellow writer or student wishes to nick a few lines or a theme of his works—what-the-hey.
There is nothing new under the sun
(to shotgun another “famous” author’s quote…) so why sweat it. Those who follow
his works, will know them—and in all his years, he has only had one, just one, of literally hundreds and
hundreds of inked pieces, truly nicked, as in plagiarized.
But
I sorta digress…
Wonder,
how many famous works we are familiar with, that started out as purely: for myself. (?)
Occasionally,
I contemplate (for example) Don McLean’s rock and roll epic dirge: American Pie. Did Don actually
formulate that piece (guess one could consider American Pie as a “laundry list”
of relative associations and characters, rather interconnected) did he begin
the process as a few scribbles, for
himself alone? Or did he actually begin listing the situations (obviously
driven by Buddy Holly’s tragic untimely death and an apparent observation of the
imminent death of America by deteriorating bits and pieces) as an audience
piece and, oh by-the-way, planned to create an historic reference? a quintessential
rock and roll anthem song?
There
are others, more suited than I to ponder the depth of this Gordian knot.
Tonight
however, I shall, not, ponder American
Pie for long. Just a short while entwined in the finely crafted and apocryphal
lyrics tends to make my brain muscle hurt. Instead, it is a Corona Extra mas
fina and a good rum soaked cigar.
Bye bye Miss American
Pie
Drove my Chevy to the levee
But the levee was dry
Them good old boys
Drove my Chevy to the levee
But the levee was dry
Them good old boys
were drinking whiskey
and rye
singing
This will be the day that I die
This will be the day that I die.
singing
This will be the day that I die
This will be the day that I die.
Write
as well as Don McLean if you dare…
Max tdc
No comments:
Post a Comment